I beg to differ that the OP "ripped" this map from the game. In fact the person must have traveled around the map, taking lots of snapshots, and stitching them together...
It's completely valid to construct a map this way, but rather uncool to claim that they "ripped" it from the ROM when in fact they did not.
I don't think that was Wario Bros's intention. The usage of the term "ripped", as it appears on most maps here, means using the in-game graphics, whether they are obtained by stitching screenshots, or by extracting more directly from data. In any case where screenshot-stitched map is put together without error, that it looks exactly the same as if it were actually extracted, there's no point to distinguish the two.
But I bring this up because I have been thinking about changing the terminology here. "Ripped" is not a good word when talking about maps, in layman's terms a "ripped map" is clearly talking about a damaged paper map. Obviously that's not the case here. But also, though a minority, we do have a number of maps done by hand, mostly without the game's graphics, which are called "original". They're original in the sense that they are put together mostly separate from the source...but the "original" in-game graphics aren't used. So confusion may easily happen - one could just as easily call the ripped maps "original", since they are very much from the original source, the game itself.
Should I rename the terms in that column? What should I change them to?
